#industry-focus/procurement/state-rail-freight-uk

The state of Rail Freight in the UK

The UK has undergone a severe recession and public spending cuts could curtail plans for further investment in infrastructure. All of which have a treme...

Freddie Pierce
|Apr 6|magazine10 min read
The UK has undergone a severe recession and public spending cuts could curtail plans for further investment in infrastructure. All of which have a tremendous bearing on rail freight’s future… but what a future it could be.

Since privatisation, rail freight has seen increased use among operators and logistics providers, creating a very efficient and competitive market. There are various reasons why major retailers are turning to rail. Compared to road, rail offers very convincing economies of scale which can dramatically reduce transport costs. Railways run to a rigorous timetable, making them suitable for reliable logistics planning. Then there are the environmental benefits. Every tonne of freight carried by rail produces far less CO2 than if moved by road.

For the UK as a whole, rail freight is also highly significant. With the economic recovery, however slow, eventually comes increased congestion on our roads, which will throw the spotlight back onto alternatives like rail. Planned container port development in the UK, with the targets they have been set through the planning system for rail use, will bring more container traffic directly onto rail through improved port facilities and rail links. Also, deals are now in place to improve access to the Channel Tunnel and High Speed 1, lending UK rail freight an international aspect that it never had before.

There is the potential to double rail freight from 23.5 billion tonne km to over 50 billion per year by 2030, thanks largely to more intermodal traffic. However, if rail is to achieve this potential it needs support. It is too easy to assume that environmental pressure or problems with road transport will deliver the hoped-for growth without rail itself having to change.

For government, tighter spending rounds are likely, but we have to make sure that rail freight funding does not evaporate. The development of rail’s Strategic Freight Network is currently funded at £200 million over five years (2009-14). This funding must be protected and then continued at or above this level over the next five-year period – and there was certainly an indication by Lord Adonis, the Transport Secretary, at an FTA meeting at the Labour Party Conference that this is being considered.

However, public policy on infrastructure is not just about spending. For rail to meet its full potential we need easy access to the network in the right places. Suitable rail freight terminal sites must be found and approved for development if we want to get serious about removing more goods from roads and onto rail. Sadly, common sense rarely wins in the fight against Nimbyism where intermodal terminals are concerned.

Looking beyond the Government, Network Rail (NR) has to meet its cost-reducing targets and, in doing so, ensure that rail continues to offer a price competitive service. In theory, NR’s proposals to introduce Sunday running will help to achieve this goal. However, the corollary of opening rail lines up seven-days-a week could mean more lines closing at night, a disadvantage to freight train operators. NR should address this issue through improved working practices. After all, the road network is always open, so too should the rail freight network.

Rail freight operators must keep their service levels high, otherwise retailers and manufacturers will return to their comfort zone of road services. Competition among operations must be encouraged to help develop innovative and bespoke services. Therefore, the Office of Rail Regulation has to keep barriers to entry (i.e. freight paths) low.

Finally, international rail freight faces a series of barriers before it can realise its full potential. For the UK the crucial issue will be the Channel Tunnel and High Speed 1. We need a long-term deal that will reduce costs closer to NR standard per km charges for freight. Only then will the offering become truly competitive and allow the UK to take full advantage of long-distance European rail freight services. High Speed 2 can play an important role here too, depending upon the cost of freight access.

Rail freight is already a key link in the UK’s supply chain, but with more businesses waking up to and relying upon its many advantages, the possibilities for rail freight’s growth are potentially vast.